Colorado AI Act (CAIA) Compliance: Your 2026 Readiness Guide
Efficiency is your goal. Compliance is your shield. Learn how to prepare for SB24-205 before the June 30, 2026 deadline.
Published by InsidePartners
1. What is CAIA (SB24-205)?
The Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (CAIA), passed as Senate Bill 24-205, is the most comprehensive state-level AI regulation in the United States. Signed by Governor Jared Polis on May 17, 2024, this landmark legislation takes effect on June 30, 2026.
CAIA establishes a "duty of care" requiring businesses to protect individuals from algorithmic discrimination—bias in AI-driven decisions based on protected characteristics like race, gender, age, or disability.
The law applies to any business that uses AI to make "consequential decisions" affecting Colorado residents, regardless of where the business is headquartered. If you serve customers in Colorado and use AI in certain decision-making processes, CAIA applies to you.
Why CAIA Matters
Colorado is the first state to enact comprehensive AI consumer protection legislation. Other states are already using CAIA as a model for their own laws. Early compliance positions your business ahead of a wave of similar regulations nationwide.
2. What Are "Consequential Decisions"?
CAIA focuses on "high-risk AI systems"—those used to make decisions that significantly impact people's lives. The law defines these as consequential decisions in the following areas:
Employment
Hiring, firing, promotions, compensation, job assignments, performance evaluations
Housing
Rental applications, lease terms, mortgage approvals, property management decisions
Education
Admissions, scholarships, disciplinary actions, accommodations, grading systems
Healthcare
Treatment recommendations, diagnostic support, care prioritization, insurance coverage
Financial Services
Loan approvals, credit decisions, interest rates, account management, fraud detection
Insurance
Coverage decisions, premium pricing, claims processing, risk assessments
Government Services
Benefits eligibility, licensing, permit approvals, public assistance programs
Legal Services
Case assessments, document review, risk analysis, client intake decisions
If your business uses AI in any of these areas and serves Colorado residents, CAIA applies to you.
3. The Problem: Most Companies Don't Know Where Their AI Is
Here's the uncomfortable truth: most mid-market companies have no idea how much AI is already embedded in their operations. AI isn't just chatbots and custom machine learning models—it's quietly running inside the tools you use every day.
Tool sprawl with embedded AI. Your CRM (Salesforce Einstein), your ERP (NetSuite analytics), your hiring platform (LinkedIn Recruiter, HireVue), your customer service tools (Zendesk AI, Intercom)—all contain AI features you may be using without realizing it. Each one could trigger CAIA compliance requirements.
Shadow AI. Employees across your organization are using ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini, and other AI tools to draft emails, analyze data, write reports, and make recommendations. If any of these outputs influence consequential decisions, they fall under CAIA.
Third-party vendors. Your payroll provider, your background check service, your insurance underwriter—many of these vendors use AI in their processes. Under CAIA, you may be responsible for ensuring their AI complies with the law.
No centralized inventory. Without a systematic audit, you have no way of knowing which processes use AI, which are high-risk under CAIA, and which require documentation.
The Documentation Gap
The CAIA requires a written Impact Assessment for every high-risk AI process. Most companies don't even have a list of where their AI is. You cannot document what you haven't identified.
4. Developer vs. Deployer: Know Your Role
CAIA creates different obligations for two types of entities: Developers (those who build AI systems) and Deployers (those who use AI systems to make decisions).
| Aspect | Developer | Deployer |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Builds or substantially modifies AI systems | Uses AI systems for consequential decisions |
| Key Requirements | Model cards, dataset documentation, known limitations disclosure | Impact assessments, risk management programs, consumer disclosures |
| Notification Duties | 90-day AG notice if discrimination risk discovered | Consumer disclosures before consequential decisions |
| Documentation | Provide documentation to deployers | Retain all documentation for 3 years |
Most mid-market companies are Deployers—they use AI tools built by others (Salesforce, HubSpot, Microsoft, Google, etc.) rather than building custom AI systems. This guide focuses primarily on Deployer obligations, which represent the majority of CAIA compliance work for typical businesses.
5. CAIA Compliance Requirements for Deployers
If you deploy high-risk AI systems, CAIA requires you to implement several compliance measures:
1. Impact Assessments
You must conduct a written impact assessment for each high-risk AI system:
- Before deploying any new high-risk AI system
- Annually for existing systems
- After any significant modification to the system
2. Risk Management Program
Implement a risk management program aligned with recognized frameworks like the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF) or ISO/IEC 42001. This program must identify, assess, and mitigate algorithmic discrimination risks.
3. Consumer Disclosures
Before making a consequential decision, you must provide consumers with clear notice including:
- The purpose of the AI system
- The nature of the decision being made
- A plain-language description of the system
- Contact information for appeals or human review
4. Documentation Retention
Maintain all impact assessments, risk management documentation, and compliance records for at least 3 years.
5. Post-Deployment Monitoring
Continuously monitor AI systems for algorithmic discrimination and unexpected outcomes. Document your monitoring processes and any issues discovered.
6. The Affirmative Defense: Your Legal Shield
Here's the most important provision in CAIA for deployers: the law provides an Affirmative Defense against allegations of algorithmic discrimination.
What Is an Affirmative Defense?
Under Colorado law, deployers who comply with recognized AI governance frameworks receive an affirmative defense against allegations of algorithmic discrimination.
This means if something goes wrong, your company is legally protected because you demonstrated "reasonable care" through documented compliance with industry standards.
To qualify for the affirmative defense, your risk management program must align with one of these recognized frameworks:
NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF)
The National Institute of Standards and Technology's voluntary framework for managing AI risks throughout the AI lifecycle.
Covers: Governance, mapping, measuring, and managing AI risks
ISO/IEC 42001
The international standard for AI management systems, providing requirements for establishing, implementing, and maintaining AI governance.
Covers: AI policies, risk assessment, performance evaluation
Key Point: Our Process Heatmap Audit aligns with the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, helping establish the documentation you need for your affirmative defense.
7. 2025 Is the Year of Documentation
With the June 30, 2026 deadline approaching, 2025 should be your "Year of Documentation." Impact assessments take time to complete properly—especially when you first need to discover where AI exists in your organization.
| Phase | Timing | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Discovery | Q1-Q2 2025 (Now) | Complete AI inventory & high-risk classification |
| Assessment | Q3-Q4 2025 | Complete impact assessments & documentation |
| Implementation | Q1 2026 | Risk management program & consumer disclosures |
| Deadline | June 30, 2026 | Full compliance required |
Ready to Map Your AI Footprint?
Our Process Heatmap Audit now includes full SB24-205 (CAIA) risk mapping. We identify every AI touchpoint in your workflow and flag the "High-Risk" ones before the 2026 deadline.
8. The Solution: CAIA-Enhanced Process Heatmap Audit
Our Process Heatmap Audit has been enhanced to address CAIA compliance requirements. Here's what we deliver:
Complete AI Inventory
Every AI touchpoint across your workflows—including embedded AI in third-party tools, shadow AI usage, and vendor AI systems.
High-Risk Classification
Clear identification of which AI processes fall under CAIA's "consequential decisions" categories and require impact assessments.
Gap Analysis
What documentation you're missing, what processes need consumer disclosures, and where your current practices fall short of CAIA requirements.
Impact Assessment Templates
Pre-filled templates based on your specific AI uses, ready for your team to complete and maintain.
NIST AI RMF Alignment Report
Documentation showing how your AI governance aligns with the NIST framework—the foundation for your affirmative defense.
Prioritized Remediation Roadmap
A clear sequence of what to fix first, based on risk level and compliance deadlines.
9. Small Business Exemption: Read the Fine Print
CAIA includes an exemption for small businesses, but it's narrower than most people assume.
Small Business Exemption Criteria
Organizations with fewer than 50 employees are exempt from most CAIA requirements, BUT only if:
- They do NOT use their own data to train or fine-tune AI systems
- They do NOT substantially modify AI systems beyond standard configuration
When the Exemption Doesn't Apply
If you customize AI models with your company's data—even just fine-tuning a vendor's system with your customer data—you likely do not qualify for the small business exemption. Many companies using AI for personalized recommendations, custom chatbots, or industry-specific models will still need to comply.
10. Penalties for Non-Compliance
CAIA violations are treated as unfair trade practices under Colorado law. The penalties can be significant:
Financial Penalties
Up to $20,000
Per violation. Each AI-influenced decision affecting a Colorado resident could be a separate violation.
Enforcement Process
The Colorado Attorney General can issue violation notices. You have 60 days to cure the violation before enforcement actions begin.
Plus potential reputational damage from public enforcement.
The Math on Non-Compliance
Without proper documentation, every AI-influenced decision could be a separate violation. If your HR system uses AI to screen 100 job applicants and lacks required disclosures, that's potentially 100 violations—up to $2 million in exposure from a single hiring cycle.
11. Why This Matters Beyond Colorado
Even if your business isn't based in Colorado, CAIA is worth your attention for several reasons:
Colorado serves as a model. Multiple states are already drafting AI legislation using CAIA as a template. What you build for Colorado compliance will likely apply to future state laws.
Federal legislation is stalled. With Congress unable to pass comprehensive AI regulation, states are filling the gap. Expect a patchwork of state laws that will converge toward CAIA-like requirements.
Multi-state operations. If you serve customers in multiple states, you'll need to comply with the most stringent requirements. CAIA compliance puts you ahead of the curve.
Competitive advantage. Companies that can demonstrate responsible AI practices will have an advantage with customers, partners, and investors who increasingly care about AI governance.
The bottom line: Building a robust AI governance program now—with proper documentation and NIST framework alignment—prepares you for whatever AI regulations come next, whether from Colorado, other states, or eventually the federal government.
Related Reading
Don't Wait for the 2026 Deadline
Our CAIA-enhanced Process Heatmap Audit gives you the documentation foundation for compliance and your affirmative defense.
Free consultation. We'll assess your AI exposure and compliance gaps.